↓ Skip to main content

Testing the association between psychosocial job strain and adverse birth outcomes - design and methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing the association between psychosocial job strain and adverse birth outcomes - design and methods
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann D Larsen, Harald Hannerz, Carsten Obel, Ane M Thulstrup, Jens P Bonde, Karin S Hougaard

Abstract

A number of studies have examined the effects of prenatal exposure to stress on birth outcomes but few have specifically focused on psychosocial job strain. In the present protocol, we aim to examine if work characterised by high demands and low control, during pregnancy, is associated with the risk of giving birth to a child born preterm or small for gestational age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Psychology 12 13%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,245
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,079
of 109,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#118
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.