↓ Skip to main content

Observations on rift valley fever virus and vaccines in Egypt

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Observations on rift valley fever virus and vaccines in Egypt
Published in
Virology Journal, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-8-532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samia Ahmed Kamal

Abstract

Rift Valley Fever virus (RVFV, genus: Phlebovirus, family: Bunyaviridae), is an arbovirus which causes significant morbidity and mortality in animals and humans. RVFV was introduced for the first time in Egypt in 1977. In endemic areas, the insect vector control and vaccination is considering appropriate measures if applied properly and the used vaccine is completely safe and the vaccination programs cover all the susceptible animals. Egypt is importing livestock and camels from the African Horn & the Sudan for human consumption. The imported livestock and camels were usually not vaccinated against RVFV. But in rare occasions, the imported livestock were vaccinated but with unknown date of vaccination and the unvaccinated control contacts were unavailable for laboratory investigations. Also, large number of the imported livestock and camels are often escaped slaughtering for breeding which led to the spread of new strains of FMD and the introduction of RVFV from the enzootic African countries. This article provide general picture about the present situation of RVFV in Egypt to help in controlling this important disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2013.
All research outputs
#6,376,970
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#680
of 3,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,112
of 242,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#21
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.