You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using entrustable professional activities to guide curriculum development in psychiatry training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-96 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip Boyce, Christine Spratt, Mark Davies, Prue McEvoy |
| Abstract |
Clinical activities that trainees can be trusted to perform with minimal or no supervision have been labelled as Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). We sought to examine what activities could be entrusted to psychiatry trainees in their first year of specialist training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 11% |
| Professor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 29% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,251
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,195
of 239,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.