You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in cotton by improved sgRNA expression
Plant Methods, October 2018
Lu Long, Dan-Dan Guo, Wei Gao, Wen-Wen Yang, Li-Pan Hou, Xiao-Nan Ma, Yu-Chen Miao, Jose Ramon Botella, Chun-Peng Song
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||6||86%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||14%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||30||23%|
|Student > Master||21||16%|
|Student > Bachelor||21||16%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||52||39%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||37||28%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 344,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.