↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in cotton by improved sgRNA expression

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in cotton by improved sgRNA expression
Published in
Plant Methods, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13007-018-0353-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Long, Dan-Dan Guo, Wei Gao, Wen-Wen Yang, Li-Pan Hou, Xiao-Nan Ma, Yu-Chen Miao, Jose Ramon Botella, Chun-Peng Song

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 28%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,519,021
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#495
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,728
of 344,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.