You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hyperspectral imaging: a novel approach for plant root phenotyping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0352-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gernot Bodner, Alireza Nakhforoosh, Thomas Arnold, Daniel Leitner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 2 | 15% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 42% |
| Engineering | 11 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,888,616
of 24,088,850 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#288
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,540
of 347,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.