↓ Skip to main content

Review of ten-years presence of Aedes albopictus in Spain 2004–2014: known distribution and public health concerns

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of ten-years presence of Aedes albopictus in Spain 2004–2014: known distribution and public health concerns
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1262-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Collantes, Sarah Delacour, Pedro María Alarcón-Elbal, Ignacio Ruiz-Arrondo, Juan Antonio Delgado, Antonio Torrell-Sorio, Mikel Bengoa, Roger Eritja, Miguel Ángel Miranda, Ricardo Molina, Javier Lucientes

Abstract

Ten years have gone by since the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus was recorded for the first time in Spain. In this paper, all relevant published information about this vector in Spain for the period 2004-2014 is reviewed. The known distribution for 2014 is provided, including all historical records (published and unpublished data) and the results from samplings of the last year. The consequences on public health about the presence of the Asian tiger mosquito in Spain are also highlighted. Further, legal aspects and control plans related to the management and diseases transmitted by this invasive vector species are also discussed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 17 11%
Other 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 7%
Environmental Science 11 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,147,494
of 25,889,720 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#372
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,754
of 398,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#7
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,889,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.