↓ Skip to main content

Papillon-Lèfevre syndrome with palmoplantar keratoderma and periodontitis, a rare cause of pyrexia of unknown origin: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Papillon-Lèfevre syndrome with palmoplantar keratoderma and periodontitis, a rare cause of pyrexia of unknown origin: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13256-015-0773-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Somia Iqtadar, Sami Ullah Mumtaz, Sajid Abaidullah

Abstract

Papillon-Lefèvre Syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by diffuse, transgradient palmoplantar keratoderma, destructive periodontitis beginning in childhood, premature loss of primary teeth, and frequent cutaneous and systemic pyogenic infections. Pyogenic liver abscess is an uncommon presentation of the disease present in this case. A 16-year-old Punjabi, Pakistani boy presented to the outpatient department of a tertiary-care hospital of Lahore with high-grade fever of 2 months duration. He had been treated for a pyogenic liver abscess 2 years back with antibiotics followed by incision and drainage. He had poor orodental hygiene, palmoplantar keratoderma and periodontitis. His parents had history of consanguinity. His brother and two cousins had similar skin lesions and were edentulous. An orthopentogram showed atrophy of the alveolar bone. He was treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, and antipyretics for systemic infection. Multivitamins, topical steroids, topical keratolytics and emollients were used for his dermatological issues. Our patient was successfully treated. His fever settled and his skin lesions improved with antibiotics, topical steroids and keratolytics. He was sent home and was asked to return for follow-up on a monthly basis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 58%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,469,754
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#629
of 3,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,085
of 388,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.