You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro thermotherapy-based methods for plant virus eradication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0355-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min-Rui Wang, Zhen-Hua Cui, Jing-Wei Li, Xin-Yi Hao, Lei Zhao, Qiao-Chun Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,261,399
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#457
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,911
of 353,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.