↓ Skip to main content

Korea hypertension fact sheet 2018

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Hypertension, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Korea hypertension fact sheet 2018
Published in
Clinical Hypertension, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40885-018-0098-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyeon Chang Kim, Myeong-Chan Cho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Unspecified 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Hypertension
#81
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,082
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Hypertension
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.