↓ Skip to main content

Korea hypertension fact sheet 2018

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Hypertension, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Korea hypertension fact sheet 2018
Published in
Clinical Hypertension, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40885-018-0098-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyeon Chang Kim, Myeong-Chan Cho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Mathematics 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,536,001
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Hypertension
#108
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,659
of 343,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Hypertension
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.