↓ Skip to main content

Study design and protocol for moving forward: a weight loss intervention trial for African-American breast cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study design and protocol for moving forward: a weight loss intervention trial for African-American breast cancer survivors
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-2004-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda R. Stolley, Lisa K. Sharp, Giamila Fantuzzi, Claudia Arroyo, Patricia Sheean, Linda Schiffer, Richard Campbell, Ben Gerber

Abstract

Breast cancer survival rates are significantly lower among African-American women compared to white women. In addition, African-American women with breast cancer are more likely than white women to die from co-morbid conditions. Obesity is common among African-American women, and it contributes to breast cancer progression and the development and exacerbation of many weight-related conditions. Intervening upon obesity may decrease breast cancer and all-cause mortality among African-American breast cancer survivors. Moving Forward is a weight loss intervention being evaluated in a randomized trial with a projected sample of 240 African American breast cancer survivors. Outcomes include body mass index, body composition, waist:hip ratio, and behavioral, psychosocial and physiological measures. Survivors are randomized to either a 6-month guided weight loss intervention that involves twice weekly classes and text messaging or a self-guided weight loss intervention based on the same materials offered in the guided program. The guided intervention is being conducted in partnership with the Chicago Park District at park facilities in predominantly African-American neighborhoods in Chicago. Recruitment strategies include direct contact to women identified in hospital cancer registries, as well as community-based efforts. Data collection occurs at baseline, post-intervention (6 months) and at a 12-month follow-up. This study evaluates a community-based, guided lifestyle intervention designed to improve the health of African-American breast cancer survivors. Few studies have addressed behavioral interventions in this high-risk population. If successful, the intervention may help reduce the risk for breast cancer recurrence, secondary cancers, and co-morbid conditions, as well as improve quality of life. U.S. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02482506 , April 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 48 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 11 7%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 57 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,225,144
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,947
of 8,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,450
of 392,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#39
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.