You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Noise in the intensive care unit and its influence on sleep quality: a multicenter observational study in Dutch intensive care units
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2182-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koen S. Simons, Eva Verweij, Paul M. C. Lemmens, Sam Jelfs, Munhum Park, Peter E. Spronk, Johannes P. C. Sonneveld, Hilde-Marieken Feijen, Marijke S. van der Steen, Armin G. Kohlrausch, Mark van den Boogaard, Cornelis P. C. de Jager |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 17% |
| United States | 11 | 10% |
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 17% |
| Scientists | 11 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 90 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 98 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#486,399
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#284
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,498
of 356,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.