You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coproduction for feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trials: learning outcomes for community partners, service users and the research team
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-018-0116-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracey McConnell, Paul Best, Gavin Davidson, Tom McEneaney, Cherry Cantrell, Mark Tully |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 36% |
| Ireland | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,508,461
of 25,022,483 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#125
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,986
of 352,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,022,483 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.