You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring the lung function in the mouse: the challenge of size
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, May 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/rr199 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles G Irvin, Jason HT Bates |
| Abstract |
Measurement of the effects of drugs, mediators and infectious agents on various models of lung disease, as well as assessment of lung function in the intact mouse has the potential for significantly advancing our knowledge of lung disease. However, the small size of the mouse presents significant challenges for the assessment of lung function. Because of compromises made between precision and noninvasiveness, data obtained may have an uncertain bearing on the mechanical response of the lung. Nevertheless, considerable recent progress has been made in developing valid and useful measures of mouse lung function. These advances, resulting in our current ability to measure sophisticated indices of lung function in laboratory animals, are likely to lead to important insights into the mechanisms of lung disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 319 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 74 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 12% |
| Engineering | 36 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,417
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,273
of 54,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them