You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Population-based studies of relationships between dietary acidity load, insulin resistance and incident diabetes in Danes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-018-0395-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joachim Gæde, Trine Nielsen, Mia L. Madsen, Ulla Toft, Torben Jørgensen, Kim Overvad, Anne Tjønneland, Torben Hansen, Kristine H. Allin, Oluf Pedersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
France | 1 | 20% |
Greece | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 80% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,049,861
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#980
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,319
of 346,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.