You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nanohydroxyapatite-reinforced chitosan composite hydrogel for bone tissue repair in vitro and in vivo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-015-0099-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S Dhivya, S Saravanan, T P Sastry, N Selvamurugan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 311 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 40 | 13% |
| Engineering | 40 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,768,380
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#114
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,479
of 264,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.