↓ Skip to main content

Mentorship needs at academic institutions in resource-limited settings: a survey at makerere university college of health sciences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mentorship needs at academic institutions in resource-limited settings: a survey at makerere university college of health sciences
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damalie Nakanjako, Pauline Byakika-Kibwika, Kenneth Kintu, Jim Aizire, Fred Nakwagala, Simon Luzige, Charles Namisi, Harriet Mayanja-Kizza, Moses R Kamya

Abstract

Mentoring is a core component of medical education and career success. There is increasing global emphasis on mentorship of young scientists in order to train and develop the next leaders in global health. However, mentoring efforts are challenged by the high clinical, research and administrative demands. We evaluated the status and nature of mentoring practices at Makerere University College of Health Sciences (MAKCHS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 99 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Lecturer 7 7%
Other 30 28%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Psychology 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,635,634
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#779
of 3,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,301
of 120,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.