↓ Skip to main content

Assessing whether universal coverage with insecticide-treated nets has been achieved: is the right indicator being used?

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing whether universal coverage with insecticide-treated nets has been achieved: is the right indicator being used?
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12936-018-2505-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Koenker, Fred Arnold, Fatou Ba, Moustapha Cisse, Lamine Diouf, Erin Eckert, Marcy Erskine, Lia Florey, Megan Fotheringham, Lilia Gerberg, Christian Lengeler, Matthew Lynch, Abraham Mnzava, Susann Nasr, Médoune Ndiop, Stephen Poyer, Melanie Renshaw, Estifanos Shargie, Cameron Taylor, Julie Thwing, Suzanne Van Hulle, Yazoumé Ye, Josh Yukich, Albert Kilian

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 30 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,286,235
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#867
of 4,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,372
of 282,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them