↓ Skip to main content

Emergence of multi-acaricide resistant Rhipicephalus ticks and its implication on chemical tick control in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergence of multi-acaricide resistant Rhipicephalus ticks and its implication on chemical tick control in Uganda
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1278-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Vudriko, James Okwee-Acai, Dickson Stuart Tayebwa, Joseph Byaruhanga, Steven Kakooza, Edward Wampande, Robert Omara, Jeanne Bukeka Muhindo, Robert Tweyongyere, David Okello Owiny, Takeshi Hatta, Naotoshi Tsuji, Rika Umemiya-Shirafuji, Xuenan Xuan, Masaharu Kanameda, Kozo Fujisaki, Hiroshi Suzuki

Abstract

Acaricide failure has been on the rise in the western and central cattle corridor of Uganda. In this study, we identified the tick species associated with acaricide failure and determined their susceptibility to various acaricide molecules used for tick control in Uganda. In this cross sectional study, tick samples were collected and identified to species level from 54 purposively selected farms (from 17 districts) that mostly had a history of acaricide failure. Larval packet test was used to screen 31 tick populations from 30 farms for susceptibility at discriminating dose (DD) and 2 × DD of five panels of commercial acaricide molecules belonging to the following classes; amidine, synthetic pyrethroid (SP), organophosphate (OP) and OP-SP co-formulations (COF). Resistance was assessed based on World Health Organization criteria for screening insecticide resistance. Of the 1357 ticks identified, Rhipicephalus (Rhipicephalus) appendiculatus and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus were the major (95.6 %) tick species in farms sampled. Resistance against SP was detected in 90.0 % (27/30) of the tick populations tested. Worryingly, 60.0 % (18/30) and 63.0 % (19/30) of the above ticks were super resistant (0 % mortality) against 2 × DD cypermethrin and deltamethrin, respectively. Resistance was also detected against COF (43.3 %), OP chlorfenvinphos (13.3 %) and amitraz (12.9 %). In two years, 74.1 % (20/27) of the farms had used two to three acaricide molecules, and 55.6 % (15/27) rotated the molecules wrongly. Multi-acaricide resistance (at least 2 molecules) was detected in 55.2 % (16/29) of the resistant Rhipicephalus ticks and significantly associated with R. decoloratus (p = 0.0133), use of both SP and COF in the last 2 years (p < 0.001) and Kiruhura district (p = 0.0339). Despite emergence of amitraz resistance in the greater Bushenyi area, it was the most efficacious molecule against SP and COF resistant ticks. This study is the first to report emergence of super SP resistant and multi-acaricide resistant Rhipicephalus ticks in Uganda. Amitraz was the best acaricide against SP and COF resistant ticks. However, in the absence of technical interventions, farmer-led solutions aimed at troubleshooting for efficacy of multitude of acaricides at their disposal are expected to potentially cause negative collateral effects on future chemical tick control options, animal welfare and public health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 321 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 15%
Student > Master 44 14%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 110 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 63 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 120 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,104,575
of 25,391,471 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#870
of 5,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,014
of 397,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#17
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.