↓ Skip to main content

Early biliary decompression versus conservative treatment in acute biliary pancreatitis (APEC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early biliary decompression versus conservative treatment in acute biliary pancreatitis (APEC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-1132-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolien J. Schepers, Olaf J. Bakker, Marc G. H. Besselink, Thomas L. Bollen, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Casper H. J. van Eijck, Paul Fockens, Erwin J. M. van Geenen, Janneke van Grinsven, Nora D. L. Hallensleben, Bettina E. Hansen, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Robin Timmer, Marie-Paule G. F. Anten, Clemens J. M. Bolwerk, Foke van Delft, Hendrik M. van Dullemen, G. Willemien Erkelens, Jeanin E. van Hooft, Robert Laheij, René W. M. van der Hulst, Jeroen M. Jansen, Frank J. G. M. Kubben, Sjoerd D. Kuiken, Lars E. Perk, Rogier J. J. de Ridder, Marno C. M. Rijk, Tessa E. H. Römkens, Erik J. Schoon, Matthijs P. Schwartz, B. W. Marcel Spanier, Adriaan C. I. T. L. Tan, Willem J. Thijs, Niels G. Venneman, Frank P. Vleggaar, Wim van de Vrie, Ben J. Witteman, Hein G. Gooszen, Marco J. Bruno, for the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is mostly caused by gallstones or sludge. Early decompression of the biliary tree by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with sphincterotomy may improve outcome in these patients. Whereas current guidelines recommend early ERC in patients with concomitant cholangitis, early ERC is not recommended in patients with mild biliary pancreatitis. Evidence on the role of routine early ERC with endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients without cholangitis but with biliary pancreatitis at high risk for complications is lacking. We hypothesize that early ERC with sphincterotomy improves outcome in these patients. The APEC trial is a randomized controlled, parallel group, superiority multicenter trial. Within 24 hours after presentation to the emergency department, patients with biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis and at high risk for complications, based on an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) score of 8 or greater, Modified Glasgow score of 3 or greater, or serum C-reactive protein above 150 mg/L, will be randomized. In 27 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, 232 patients will be allocated to early ERC with sphincterotomy or to conservative treatment. The primary endpoint is a composite of major complications (that is, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis, pneumonia, bacteremia, cholangitis, pancreatic endocrine, or exocrine insufficiency) or death within 180 days after randomization. Secondary endpoints include ERC-related complications, infected necrotizing pancreatitis, length of hospital stay and an economical evaluation. The APEC trial investigates whether an early ERC with sphincterotomy reduces the composite endpoint of major complications or death compared with conservative treatment in patients with biliary pancreatitis at high risk of complications. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN97372133 (date registration: 17-12-2012).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 21%