You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0784-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carole Lunny, Sue E. Brennan, Steve McDonald, Joanne E. McKenzie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 12% |
| Australia | 8 | 12% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 58% |
| Scientists | 16 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 24% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#972,914
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#122
of 2,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,832
of 359,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.