↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and isolated creatin-kinase elevation

Overview of attention for article published in Autoimmunity Highlights, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and isolated creatin-kinase elevation
Published in
Autoimmunity Highlights, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13317-014-0063-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Iaccarino, E. Pegoraro, L. Bello, S. Bettio, E. Borella, L. Nalotto, C. Semplicini, G. Sorarù, A. Ghirardello, A. Doria

Abstract

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of diseases characterized by inflammation of the skeletal muscle. Weakness, mainly affecting the proximal muscles, is the cardinal muscular symptom in IIM. In patients with dermatomyositis, peculiar skin lesions are observed. The assessment of patients with IIM includes clinical and laboratory evaluation, and clinimetric measurements. Different tools have been proposed to measure muscular and extramuscular disease activity and damage in patients with IIM. A core set of measurements to use in clinical practice was recently proposed. Among laboratory features the increase of serum creatine kinase (CK) is considered a hallmark of muscle inflammation/damage. However, subjects with persistent CK elevation, without any evidence of a definite myopathy, are often seen in clinical practice and need a careful assessment. Indeed, CK blood levels can also increase in non-myopathic conditions, e.g. in case of intense physical exercise, assumption of some drugs (statins), muscular dystrophy, muscular trauma or in case of neuro-muscular disorders which all should be considered in the diagnostic work-up. The assessment of patients with IIM and hyperCKemia will be discussed in this paper.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 44%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,300,248
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Autoimmunity Highlights
#82
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,659
of 255,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autoimmunity Highlights
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.