↓ Skip to main content

PATCH: posture and mobility training for care staff versus usual care in care homes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PATCH: posture and mobility training for care staff versus usual care in care homes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2863-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liz Graham, Robert Cicero, David Clarke, Bonnie Cundill, Alison Ellwood, Amanda Farrin, Jill Fisher, Madeline Goodwin, Rebecca Hawkins, Karen Hull, Claire Hulme, Dominic Trépel, Rachel Williams, Anne Forster

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Sports and Recreations 5 9%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,483,347
of 14,116,115 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,290
of 3,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,559
of 269,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,116,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them