↓ Skip to main content

Bleeding complications from the direct oral anticoagulants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Hematology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bleeding complications from the direct oral anticoagulants
Published in
BMC Hematology, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12878-015-0039-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Sholzberg, Katerina Pavenski, Nadine Shehata, Christine Cserti-Gazdewich, Yulia Lin

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now standard of care for the management of thromboembolic risk. A prevalent issue of concern is how to manage direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding for which there is no specific antidote available for clinical use. We conducted a retrospective case series to describe the Toronto, Canada multicenter experience with bleeding from dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Retrospective chart review of DOAC bleeding necessitating referral to hematology and/or transfusion medicine services at five large University of Toronto affiliated academic hospitals from January 2011 to December 2013. Twenty-six patients with DOAC bleeding were reviewed; 42 % bleeds intracranial and 50 %, gastrointestinal. All patients had at least one risk factor associated with DOAC bleeding reported in previous studies. Inconsistent bleed management strategies were evident. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (1-90). Five thromboembolic events occurred after transfusion based-hemostatic therapy and there were six deaths. Management of DOAC bleeding is variable. Clinical trial data regarding DOAC reversal is needed to facilitate optimization and standardization of bleeding treatment algorithms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Librarian 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,616,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Hematology
#52
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,538
of 395,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Hematology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.