↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between cardiac diffusion tensor imaging parameters and anthropometrics in healthy volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between cardiac diffusion tensor imaging parameters and anthropometrics in healthy volunteers
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12968-015-0215-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

L.A. McGill, P.F. Ferreira, A.D. Scott, S. Nielles-Vallespin, A. Giannakidis, P.J. Kilner, P.D. Gatehouse, R. de Silva, D.N. Firmin, D.J. Pennell

Abstract

In vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is uniquely capable of interrogating laminar myocardial dynamics non-invasively. A comprehensive dataset of quantative parameters and comparison with subject anthropometrics is required. cDTI was performed at 3T with a diffusion weighted STEAM sequence. Data was acquired from the mid left ventricle in 43 subjects during the systolic and diastolic pauses. Global and regional values were determined for fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), helix angle gradient (HAg, degrees/%depth) and the secondary eigenvector angulation (E2A). Regression analysis was performed between global values and subject anthropometrics. All cDTI parameters displayed regional heterogeneity. The RR interval had a significant, but clinically small effect on systolic values for FA, HAg and E2A. Male sex and increasing left ventricular end diastolic volume were associated with increased systolic HAg. Diastolic HAg and systolic E2A were both directly related to left ventricular mass and body surface area. There was an inverse relationship between E2A mobility and both age and ejection fraction. Future interpretations of quantitative cDTI data should take into account anthropometric variations observed with patient age, body surface area and left ventricular measurements. Further work determining the impact of technical factors such as strain and SNR is required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 32%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Physics and Astronomy 5 9%
Computer Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,200,399
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#539
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,117
of 400,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.