You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ‘Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia (BCPPA)’ program for people with PPA (Primary Progressive Aphasia): protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-018-0349-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Volkmer, Aimee Spector, Jason D Warren, Suzanne Beeke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 52% |
| Australia | 6 | 12% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 62% |
| Scientists | 14 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 17% |
| Psychology | 16 | 13% |
| Linguistics | 11 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,191,761
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#36
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,038
of 352,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.