You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Different significance of HRCT and FDG-PET/CT to predict lymph node status between patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-10-s1-a332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuhiro Tsutani, Yoshihiro Miyata, Takeshi Mimura, Masaoki Ito, Yuichiro Kai, Atsushi Kagimoto, Haruhiko Nakayama, Sakae Okumura, Masahiro Yoshimura, Morihito Okada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,353,264
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#391
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,893
of 390,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.