↓ Skip to main content

Malaria burden and anti-malarial drug efficacy in Owando, northern Congo

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria burden and anti-malarial drug efficacy in Owando, northern Congo
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-1078-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brice P. Singana, Hervé Bogreau, Brunelle D. Matondo, Louis R. Dossou-Yovo, Prisca N. Casimiro, Rigobert Mbouka, Kim Yen Ha Nguyen, Bruno Pradines, Leonardo K. Basco, Mathieu Ndounga

Abstract

In the Republic of Congo, previous epidemiological studies have only been conducted in the south of the country where it is most accessible. Nationally representative data on the efficacy of new anti-malarial tools are lacking in the country. As an initial step to close the gap, clinical efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations, artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL), was assessed in Owando, a city in equatorial flooded forest in northern Republic of Congo. Under 12 years old febrile children attending public health facilities were screened for malaria parasites using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for malaria and microscopic examination of thick blood films. Patients with at least 1,000 asexual Plasmodium falciparum parasites/µl of blood were clinically examined, included after informed consent, and followed up for 28 days, according to the 2009 World Health Organization protocol. Patients were randomly assigned to co-formulated ASAQ (Coarsucam(®)) or AL (Coartem(®)) treatment groups. Plasmodium falciparum recrudescent isolates were compared to pre-treatment isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using msp1, msp2, and glurp genes to distinguish between re-infection and recrudescence. Between November 2012 and February 2013, 857 under 12 years old febrile children were screened, of whom 198 (23.1 %) had positive RDT and 167 (19.5 %) positive thick films. ASAQ and AL efficacies were 92.7 and 94.2 % before PCR correction, respectively. After genotyping, the overall efficacy was 100 % for ASAQ and 98.0 % for AL. The data reported here represent partially the burden of malaria in 0-11 years old febrile children examined in public health centres of Owando city and serve as reference for further studies. Both artemisinin-based combinations were highly efficacious in patients under 12 years old with acute uncomplicated malaria. ASAQ was associated with more adverse events, which may reduce compliance in unsupervised treatment. ACTRN12612000940875.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,780,575
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,860
of 5,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,635
of 393,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#130
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.