You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Clinical Pathology, August 2005
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6890-5-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qin Huang, Chenggong Yu, Michael Klein, James Fang, Raj K Goyal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 25% |
Professor | 5 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 50% |
Engineering | 4 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from BMC Clinical Pathology
#33
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,371
of 57,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Clinical Pathology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them