↓ Skip to main content

The ability of cancer-specific and generic preference-based instruments to discriminate across clinical and self-reported measures of cancer severities

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ability of cancer-specific and generic preference-based instruments to discriminate across clinical and self-reported measures of cancer severities
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulos Teckle, Stuart Peacock, Helen McTaggart-Cowan, Kim van der Hoek, Stephen Chia, Barb Melosky, Karen Gelmon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Other 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,457,954
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#748
of 2,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,507
of 181,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.