You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping mutations in plant genomes with the user-friendly web application CandiSNP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-014-0041-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graham J Etherington, Jacqueline Monaghan, Cyril Zipfel, Dan MacLean |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,547,925
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#837
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,607
of 354,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.