You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Eosinophilic esophagitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1710-1492-7-s1-s8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stuart Carr, Wade Watson |
Abstract |
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an atopic condition of the esophagus that has become increasingly recognized over the last decade. Diagnosis of the disorder is dependent on the patient's clinical manifestations and histologic findings on esophageal mucosal biopsies. Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis should be referred to both an allergist and gastroenterologist for optimal management, which may include dietary modifications, pharmacologic agents such as corticosteroids, leukotriene modifiers and biologics as well as mechanical dilatation of the esophagus. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of EoE are discussed in this review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 18% |
United States | 2 | 18% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Russia | 1 | 9% |
Finland | 1 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 70 | 636% |
Student > Bachelor | 62 | 564% |
Researcher | 60 | 545% |
Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 436% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 400% |
Other | 135 | 1227% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 294 | 2673% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 218% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 164% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 155% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 100% |
Other | 40 | 364% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#784
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,065
of 154,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.