↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive prediction of lncRNA–RNA interactions in human transcriptome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive prediction of lncRNA–RNA interactions in human transcriptome
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2307-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goro Terai, Junichi Iwakiri, Tomoshi Kameda, Michiaki Hamada, Kiyoshi Asai

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed that large numbers of non-coding RNAs are transcribed in humans, but only a few of them have been identified with their functions. Identification of the interaction target RNAs of the non-coding RNAs is an important step in predicting their functions. The current experimental methods to identify RNA-RNA interactions, however, are not fast enough to apply to a whole human transcriptome. Therefore, computational predictions of RNA-RNA interactions are desirable, but this is a challenging task due to the huge computational costs involved. Here, we report comprehensive predictions of the interaction targets of lncRNAs in a whole human transcriptome for the first time. To achieve this, we developed an integrated pipeline for predicting RNA-RNA interactions on the K computer, which is one of the fastest super-computers in the world. Comparisons with experimentally-validated lncRNA-RNA interactions support the quality of the predictions. Additionally, we have developed a database that catalogs the predicted lncRNA-RNA interactions to provide fundamental information about the targets of lncRNAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 25%
Computer Science 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,780,575
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,569
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,577
of 394,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#192
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.