↓ Skip to main content

Noise reduction of diffusion tensor images by sparse representation and dictionary learning

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noise reduction of diffusion tensor images by sparse representation and dictionary learning
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12938-015-0116-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youyong Kong, Yuanjin Li, Jiasong Wu, Huazhong Shu

Abstract

The low quality of diffusion tensor image (DTI) could affect the accuracy of oncology diagnosis. We present a novel sparse representation based denoising method for three dimensional DTI by learning adaptive dictionary with the context redundancy between neighbor slices. In this study, the context redundancy among the adjacent slices of the diffusion weighted imaging volumes is utilized to train sparsifying dictionaries. Therefore, higher redundancy could be achieved for better description of image with lower computation complexity. The optimization problem is solved efficiently using an iterative block-coordinate relaxation method. The effectiveness of our proposed method has been assessed on both simulated and real experimental DTI datasets. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations demonstrate the performance of the proposed method on the simulated data. The experiments on real datasets with different b-values also show the effectiveness of the proposed method for noise reduction of DTI. The proposed approach well removes the noise in the DTI, which has high potential to be applied for clinical oncology applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 18%
Engineering 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Computer Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,938,831
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#175
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,049
of 397,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.