You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Earth Microbiome Project: Meeting report of the “1st EMP meeting on sample selection and acquisition” at Argonne National Laboratory October 6th 2010
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.4056/aigs.1443528 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jack A. Gilbert, Folker Meyer, Janet Jansson, Jeff Gordon, Norman Pace, James Tiedje, Ruth Ley, Noah Fierer, Dawn Field, Nikos Kyrpides, Frank-Oliver Glöckner, Hans-Peter Klenk, K. Eric Wommack, Elizabeth Glass, Kathryn Docherty, Rachel Gallery, Rick Stevens, Rob Knight |
| Abstract |
This report details the outcome the first meeting of the Earth Microbiome Project to discuss sample selection and acquisition. The meeting, held at the Argonne National Laboratory on Wednesday October 6(th) 2010, focused on discussion of how to prioritize environmental samples for sequencing and metagenomic analysis as part of the global effort of the EMP to systematically determine the functional and phylogenetic diversity of microbial communities across the world. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Egypt | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 201 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 28% |
| Researcher | 44 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 110 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,174,756
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#34
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,664
of 190,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.