You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patients and agents – or why we need a different narrative: a philosophical analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13010-018-0068-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harald Walach, Michael Loughlin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 23% |
| Psychology | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,326,881
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#95
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,659
of 348,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.