↓ Skip to main content

Baseline insulin sensitivity affects response to high-amylose maize resistant starch in women: a randomized, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Baseline insulin sensitivity affects response to high-amylose maize resistant starch in women: a randomized, controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12986-016-0062-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara A. Gower, Richard Bergman, Darko Stefanovski, Betty Darnell, Fernando Ovalle, Gordon Fisher, S. Katherine Sweatt, Holly S. Resuehr, Christine Pelkman

Abstract

Resistant starch (RS) is a type of dietary fiber that can improve glucose metabolism, but its effects may be modulated by sex or baseline insulin sensitivity. This study was designed to examine the effect of high-amylose maize resistant starch (HAM-RS2) on insulin sensitivity (SI) in women, and to determine if SI status affects the response to RS. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study. Participants were 40 healthy, non-diabetic women aged 22-67 years in the normal-weight to obese BMI range (20.6-47.4 kg/m(2)). Two doses of HAM-RS2 were tested, 15 and 30 g per day, administered in the form of cookies. Participants were randomized to the order in which they received the experimental and placebo product. Each arm was 4 weeks, with a 4-week wash-out period in between. SI was assessed at the end of each 4-week arm of product consumption by frequently-sampled, insulin-modified, intravenous glucose tolerance test and minimal modeling. Participants were categorized as being insulin resistant (IR; SI < 7.8) or insulin sensitive (IS; SI ≥ 7.8) based on Gaussian analysis. The effect of treatment arm on SI was examined by mixed-model analysis within IR and IS sub-groups, using all available data. In addition, SI was examined by ANOVA among just those women who completed all three arms of the study with valid SI results. Among IR participants, SI was on average ~16 % higher after the 30 g arm when compared to the control arm by mixed-model analysis (n = 40, P < 0.05), and tended to be 23 % higher by ANOVA among women who completed all arms (n = 23, P = 0.06). HAM-RS2 did not affect SI in IS women. Consumption of HAM-RS2 at 30 g/day in the form of a snack food item was associated with improved insulin sensitivity in women with insulin resistance. NCT0152806.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,294,872
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#186
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,710
of 395,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.