↓ Skip to main content

A semi-parametric statistical model for integrating gene expression profiles across different platforms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A semi-parametric statistical model for integrating gene expression profiles across different platforms
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0847-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yafei Lyu, Qunhua Li

Abstract

Determining differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between biological samples is the key to understand how genotype gives rise to phenotype. RNA-seq and microarray are two main technologies for profiling gene expression levels. However, considerable discrepancy has been found between DEGs detected using the two technologies. Integration data across these two platforms has the potential to improve the power and reliability of DEG detection. We propose a rank-based semi-parametric model to determine DEGs using information across different sources and apply it to the integration of RNA-seq and microarray data. By incorporating both the significance of differential expression and the consistency across platforms, our method effectively detects DEGs with moderate but consistent signals. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method using simulation studies, MAQC/SEQC data and a synthetic microRNA dataset. Our integration method is not only robust to noise and heterogeneity in the data, but also adaptive to the structure of data. In our simulations and real data studies, our approach shows a higher discriminate power and identifies more biologically relevant DEGs than eBayes, DEseq and some commonly used meta-analysis methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Computer Science 4 9%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,674,561
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,357
of 7,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,531
of 394,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#28
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.