↓ Skip to main content

Risks associated with endotoxins in feed additives produced by fermentation

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risks associated with endotoxins in feed additives produced by fermentation
Published in
Environmental Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12940-016-0087-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. John Wallace, Jürgen Gropp, Noël Dierick, Lucio G. Costa, Giovanna Martelli, Paul G. Brantom, Vasileios Bampidis, Derek W. Renshaw, Lubomir Leng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Unspecified 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 9%
Unspecified 8 9%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,458,309
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#743
of 1,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,756
of 402,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.