↓ Skip to main content

Deciphering transcriptional regulations coordinating the response to environmental changes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deciphering transcriptional regulations coordinating the response to environmental changes
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-0885-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicente Acuña, Andrés Aravena, Carito Guziolowski, Damien Eveillard, Anne Siegel, Alejandro Maass

Abstract

Gene co-expression evidenced as a response to environmental changes has shown that transcriptional activity is coordinated, which pinpoints the role of transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs). Nevertheless, the prediction of TRNs based on the affinity of transcription factors (TFs) with binding sites (BSs) generally produces an over-estimation of the observable TF/BS relations within the network and therefore many of the predicted relations are spurious. We present LOMBARDE, a bioinformatics method that extracts from a TRN determined from a set of predicted TF/BS affinities a subnetwork explaining a given set of observed co-expressions by choosing the TFs and BSs most likely to be involved in the co-regulation. LOMBARDE solves an optimization problem which selects confident paths within a given TRN that join a putative common regulator with two co-expressed genes via regulatory cascades. To evaluate the method, we used public data of Escherichia coli to produce a regulatory network that explained almost all observed co-expressions while using only 19 % of the input TF/BS affinities but including about 66 % of the independent experimentally validated regulations in the input data. When all known validated TF/BS affinities were integrated into the input data the precision of LOMBARDE increased significantly. The topological characteristics of the subnetwork that was obtained were similar to the characteristics described for known validated TRNs. LOMBARDE provides a useful modeling scheme for deciphering the regulatory mechanisms that underlie the phenotypic responses of an organism to environmental challenges. The method can become a reliable tool for further research on genome-scale transcriptional regulation studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 6%
France 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Computer Science 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Chemistry 2 11%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,471,048
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,024
of 7,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,679
of 392,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#63
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.