You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical considerations for HIV cure-related research at the end of life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-018-0321-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karine Dubé, Sara Gianella, Susan Concha-Garcia, Susan J Little, Andy Kaytes, Jeff Taylor, Kushagra Mathur, Sogol Javadi, Anshula Nathan, Hursch Patel, Stuart Luter, Sean Philpott-Jones, Brandon Brown, Davey Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,238,128
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#347
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,225
of 349,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.