↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Sound on Postural Stability during Quiet Standing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Sound on Postural Stability during Quiet Standing
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-8-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung Ha Park, Kichol Lee, Thurmon Lockhart, Sukwon Kim

Abstract

Loss of postural stability can increase the likelihood of slips and falls in workplaces. The present study intended to extend understanding of the effects of frequency and pressure level of sound on postural stability during standing. Eleven male subjects participated. Standing on a force platform, the subjects' center of pressures were measured under different combinations of pressure level and frequency of the sound. Variables such as the position variability of COP and the length of postural sway path in anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) direction were evaluated. Subjective ratings of perceived disturbance at each experimental condition were also obtained using a 7-point rating scale. Results showed that the length of sway path and the position variability of COP increased as the frequency of sound increased in posterior-anterior axis. The effect of sound pressure level, however, was not significant on both the postural sway length and the position variability of COP. These results suggested substantial disturbance of standing balance system among subjects exposed to high frequency noise. The results implied that physical workers should be alerted that their abilities of postural balance could be degraded significantly as disturbance caused by a sound existed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Libya 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Sports and Recreations 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,861,788
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#684
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,295
of 242,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.