↓ Skip to main content

Unplanned revision spinal surgery within a week: a retrospective analysis of surgical causes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unplanned revision spinal surgery within a week: a retrospective analysis of surgical causes
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12891-016-0891-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsung-Ting Tsai, Sheng-Hsun Lee, Chi-Chien Niu, Po-Liang Lai, Lih-Huei Chen, Wen-Jer Chen

Abstract

The need for revision surgery after a spinal surgery can cause a variety of problems, including reduced quality of life for the patient, additional medical expenses, and patient-physician conflicts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the causes of unplanned revision spinal surgery within a week after the initial surgery in order to identify the surgical issues most commonly associated with unplanned revision surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients at who received a spinal surgery at a regional medical center from July 2004 to April 2011 in order to identify those who required a revision surgery within one week of their initial surgery. Patients were excluded if they received a vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, or nerve block surgery, because those surgeries are one-day surgeries that do not require hospital admission. In addition, patients with a primary diagnosis of wound infection were also excluded since reoperations for infection control can be expected. The overall incidence of unplanned revision spinal surgery during the time period covered by this review was 1.12 % (116/10,350 patients). The most common surgical causes of reoperation were screw malposition (41 patients), symptomatic epidural hematoma (27 patients), and inadequate decompression (37 patients). Screw malposition was the most common complication, with an incidence rate of 0.82 %. Screw instrumentation was significantly associated with revision surgery (p = 0.023), which suggests that this procedure carried a greater risk of requiring revision. The mean time interval to reoperation for epidural hematomas was significantly shorter than the intervals for other causes of revision spinal surgery (p < 0.001), which suggests that epidural hematoma was more emergent than other complications. Also, 25.93 % of patients who underwent hematoma removal experienced residual sequelae; this percentage was significantly higher than for other surgical causes of revision spinal surgery (p = 0.013). The results suggest that to avoid the need for reoperation, screw malposition, inadequate decompression, and epidural hematoma are the key surgical complications to be guarded against. Accordingly, adequate decompression, epidural hematoma prevention, and proper pedicle screw placement may help reduce the incidence of revision surgery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 20 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 22 49%