↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of labour pain management of Dutch primary care midwives: a focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions of labour pain management of Dutch primary care midwives: a focus group study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0795-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trudy Klomp, Ank de Jonge, Eileen K. Hutton, Suzanne Hers, Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

Labour pain is a major concern for women, their partners and maternity health care professionals. However, little is known about Dutch midwives' perceptions of working with women experiencing labour pain. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' perceptions of supporting women in dealing with pain during labour. We conducted a qualitative focus group study with four focus groups, including a total of 23 midwives from 23 midwifery practices across the country. Purposive sampling was used to select the practices. The constant comparison method of Glaser and Straus (1967, ren. 1995) was used to gain an understanding of midwives' perceptions regarding labour pain management. We found two main themes. The first theme concerned the midwives' experienced professional role conflict, which was reflected in their approach of labour pain management along a spectrum from "working with pain" to a "pain relief" approach. The second theme identified situational factors, including time constraints; discontinuity of care; role of the partner; and various cultural influences, that altered the context in which care was provided and how midwives saw their professional role. Midwives felt challenged by the need to balance their professional attitude towards normal birth and labour pain, which favours working with pain, with the shift in society towards a wider acceptance of pharmacological pain management during labour. This shift compelled them to redefine their professional identity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 10 7%
Lecturer 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 41 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 52 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 45 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,230,777
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,403
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,588
of 394,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#37
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.