↓ Skip to main content

A longitudinal genome-wide association study of anti-tumor necrosis factor response among Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A longitudinal genome-wide association study of anti-tumor necrosis factor response among Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13075-016-0920-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyoko Honne, Ingileif Hallgrímsdóttir, Chunsen Wu, Ronnie Sebro, Nicholas P. Jewell, Takeo Sakurai, Masahiro Iwamoto, Seiji Minota, Damini Jawaheer

Abstract

Studies of Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to identify genetic biomarkers of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) response have used response at a single time point as the phenotype with which single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations have been tested. The findings have been inconsistent across studies. Among Japanese patients, only a few SNPs have been investigated. We report here the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genetic biomarkers of anti-TNF response among Japanese RA patients, using response at 2 time-points for a more reliable clinical phenotype over time. Disease Activity Scores based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) were assessed at baseline (before initial therapy), and after 3 and 6 months in 487 Japanese RA patients starting anti-TNF therapy for the first time or switching to a new anti-TNF agent. A genome-wide panel of SNPs was genotyped and additional SNPs were imputed. Using change in DAS28 scores from baseline at both 3 (ΔDAS-3) and 6 months (ΔDAS-6) as the response phenotype, a longitudinal genome-wide association analysis was conducted using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models, adjusting for baseline DAS28, treatment duration, type of anti-TNF agent and concomitant methotrexate. Cross-sectional analyses were performed using multivariate linear regression models, with response from a single time point (ΔDAS-3 or ΔDAS-6) as phenotype; all other variables were the same as in the GEE models. In the GEE models, borderline significant association was observed at 3 chromosomal regions (6q15: rs284515, p = 6.6x10(-7); 6q27: rs75908454, p = 6.3x10(-7) and 10q25.3: rs1679568, p = 8.1x10(-7)), extending to numerous SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) across each region. Potential candidate genes in these regions include MAP3K7, BACH2 (6q15), GFRA1 (10q25.3), and WDR27 (6q27). The association at GFRA1 replicates a previous finding from a Caucasian dataset. In the cross-sectional analyses, ΔDAS-6 was significantly associated with the 6q15 locus (rs284511, p = 2.5x10(-8)). No other significant or borderline significant associations were identified. Three genomic regions demonstrated significant or borderline significant associations with anti-TNF response in our dataset of Japanese RA patients, including a locus previously associated among Caucasians. Using repeated measures of response as phenotype enhanced the power to detect these associations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,201,987
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#656
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,491
of 401,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#32
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.