You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A framework for assessing the impact of pharmaceutical reimbursement policies on incentives to innovate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2052-3211-8-s1-p26 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Docteur, Joshua Cohen, Brian K Bruen, Ruth Lopert, Avi Dor, Chuck Shih |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,990,238
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#79
of 415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,586
of 278,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.