↓ Skip to main content

Testing implementation support for evidence-based programs in community settings: a replication cluster-randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing implementation support for evidence-based programs in community settings: a replication cluster-randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13012-018-0825-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Chinman, Patricia Ebener, Patrick S. Malone, Jill Cannon, Elizabeth J. D’Amico, Joie Acosta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 49 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Psychology 9 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 58 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,998,480
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#636
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,346
of 355,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.