You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The struggle to differentiate inflammation from infection in severely burned patients: time to send better biomarkers into the arena?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1194-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick M. Honore, Herbert D. Spapen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 36% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,929,736
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,727
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,014
of 403,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#24
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.