↓ Skip to main content

Constructing a semantic predication gold standard from the biomedical literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Constructing a semantic predication gold standard from the biomedical literature
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-12-486
Pubmed ID
Authors

Halil Kilicoglu, Graciela Rosemblat, Marcelo Fiszman, Thomas C Rindflesch

Abstract

Semantic relations increasingly underpin biomedical text mining and knowledge discovery applications. The success of such practical applications crucially depends on the quality of extracted relations, which can be assessed against a gold standard reference. Most such references in biomedical text mining focus on narrow subdomains and adopt different semantic representations, rendering them difficult to use for benchmarking independently developed relation extraction systems. In this article, we present a multi-phase gold standard annotation study, in which we annotated 500 sentences randomly selected from MEDLINE abstracts on a wide range of biomedical topics with 1371 semantic predications. The UMLS Metathesaurus served as the main source for conceptual information and the UMLS Semantic Network for relational information. We measured interannotator agreement and analyzed the annotations closely to identify some of the challenges in annotating biomedical text with relations based on an ontology or a terminology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 96 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 39 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Linguistics 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#12,852,228
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,776
of 7,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,669
of 243,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#56
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.