↓ Skip to main content

Case management to improve adherence for HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia: a micro-costing study

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case management to improve adherence for HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia: a micro-costing study
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-9-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliot A Marseille, Sebastian Kevany, Ismael Ahmed, Getachew Feleke, Bill Graham, Thomas Heller, James G Kahn, Michael Reyes

Abstract

Adherence to antiretroviral medication regimens is essential to good clinical outcomes for HIV-infected patients. Little is known about the costs of case management (CM) designed to improve adherence for patients identified as being at risk for poor adherence in resource-constrained settings. This study analyzed the costs, outputs, unit costs and correlates of unit cost variation for CM services in 14 ART sites in Ethiopia from October 2008 through September 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,777,586
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#242
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,396
of 248,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them