↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics and job satisfaction of general practitioners using complementary and alternative medicine in Germany - is there a pattern?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics and job satisfaction of general practitioners using complementary and alternative medicine in Germany - is there a pattern?
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-11-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie Joos, Berthold Musselmann, Joachim Szecsenyi, Katja Goetz

Abstract

The use of Complementary and Alternative medicine (CAM) has increased over the past years. In Germany, many general practitioners (GPs) use CAM in their daily practice. However, little is known about possible differences of GPs using CAM compared to GPs not using CAM. The aim of the study was to explore differences in personal and practice characteristics, work load and job satisfaction of GPs depending on their use of and attitude towards CAM. Furthermore, predictors for CAM use should be explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
Spain 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 39 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2011.
All research outputs
#8,603,204
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,322
of 4,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,417
of 253,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.